https://insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk/2014/05/14/content-clinic-30-april-what-we-covered/

Content clinic 30 April: what we covered

The information in this blogpost may now be out of date. See the current GOV.UK content and publishing guidance.

We ran a slightly smaller content clinic this month, due to the Tube strike. But there was still plenty to talk about, including style issues, infographics, accessibility and broken links.

Capitalisation

We discussed which words should and shouldn't be capitalised. Lower case is preferable because it's easier and faster to read (about 17% faster than upper case). Names, proper nouns and official titles should be capitalised, eg the Department of Health. After the first mention, refer to it as 'the department'.

Official titles, like the Access to Work grant, or legislation, like the Animal Welfare Act 2006 should be capitalised. Publication page titles shouldn't (but document titles should be written as it is in the document). See the A to Z in the style guide for common examples.

Today (13 May)

We were asked whether you have to write the date after every mention of 'today' in a news story or press release. We decided that it makes sense to write the date only after the first mention, rather than every time.

Numbers

The style guide says: 'Write all numbers in numerals (including 1 to 9) except where it’s part of a common expression and it would look strange, eg ‘one or two of them’. Use common sense.' Most numbers should always be written in numerals, but one/1 can be tricky.

'According to research, 1 in 4 people experience mental health issues, but one of the best ways to prevent them is to control stress.'

In this example, we used figures for '1 in 4' because it's a statistic. We think it would look odd to say '1 of the best ways', because it's a commonly used phrase and not necessarily numerical.

Accessibility - PDFs

People asked if they need bookmarks on PDFs. Yes, it helps with accessibility. It can be time consuming, but it's important to do.

Filtering documents in Whitehall when bulk-publishing

At the moment the filter automatically changes to 'published' when you publish a page. This can be annoying when you have multiple documents to publish as it takes you back to the list of published pages, rather than your list of pages to publish. We were asked if this can be changed.

We've asked our publishing team to look at it and it's in their backlog. In the meantime, try opening each page you need to publish in a new tab and close it as it changes to the 'published' view.

Infographics

Editors told us that there are increasing requests in departments to produce infographics. While they can be great, they can make it harder for the user to understand something and take longer to read. Also, they must legally be accessible (ie screenreaders won't read the words in the image so they must be duplicated in the written content on the page).

If you've produced an infographic, consider publishing it on social media. The Department for Transport links to Flickr from GOV.UK.

Broken link report

Last week we sent a report to every department and agency that had broken links on departmental pages on GOV.UK. This should make fixing them much easier and faster. We'll be sending a report regularly and as broken links are fixed, it will hopefully get smaller every time.

Next content clinic

The next clinic will be 28 May at the Department for Transport, London, 3pm to 4:30pm. We'll send details on applying to come very soon.

Keep in touch. Sign up to email updates from this blog, or follow Rosie on Twitter

2 comments

  1. E. Brown

    Hi Rosie,

    Thanks for the update - I appreciate it.

    We got our first broken links report this week. The error rate was 60% (not 6%, 6-0. Sixty).

    Guess how we found out? Pretty frustrating experience. Still waiting for our name to be removed from the name-and-shame list.

    If the link checkers offer you a great deal on a used car, or affordable life insurance... run the other way.

    Link to this comment
    • Rosie Cowling

      Elizabeth,

      Thank you for your feedback and I’m sorry you’ve found the report frustrating to use. We wanted to share the report as soon as possible as broken links create a bad user journey and can block users from getting the information they need.

      Unfortunately in its first iteration, some false positives have been included in the report (links which aren’t actually broken). But thankfully with your, and other departments’, feedback, we can iterate and improve the next report to ensure it doesn’t happen a second time.

      Rosie

      Link to this comment